Pages

Monday, 12 December 2011

Retrospective - Stargate



Kurt Russell as Colonel Jack O'Neil (Stargate, 1994) 
For many of you, the mention of the word Stargate might bring about thoughts of Richard Dean 'Macgyver' Anderson travelling to various destinations across the universe with his SG-1 team, smart mouthing his superiors and getting himself out of ridiculous situations with just a tub of moth balls and a roll of tin foil. Or it might remind you of the later series Stargate Atlantis, or even the recently cancelled Stargate Universe.

But for me, the mention of Stargate brings about thoughts of the distant and mostly disregarded 1994 movie, directed by Roland Emmerich at the highest point of his career. Unlike the TV show, the 1994 movie featured a rather restrained Kurt Russell in the role of Colonel Jack O'Neil. James Spader (Boston Legal) is Daniel Jackson, a role later taken over by Michael Shanks. There is no sign of Samantha Carter here, or the loyal Jaffa Teal'c. Infact, the only actors to appear in both the Stargate movie and the SG-1 TV series are Alexis Cruz as Skaara and Erick Avari as Kasuf. Everyone else is either absent or recast. So for those watching the film for the first time after seeing the TV show, it won't feel much like familiar territory, but the same underlying formula is all there.

Stargate was quite successful on its initial release, launching Emmerich and co-writer Dean Devlin into the mainstream, and presenting them with the opportunity to make more widely recognised movies such as Independence Day in 1996.
Richard Dean Anderson as Colonel Jack O'Neill (Stargate SG-1)
It's no wonder Stargate spawned a TV spin off that ran for 10 years and 10 seasons. The film was rich with ancient conspiracies, Egyptian mythology, new age 90s digital effects and well structured action with a sweeping music score by newcomer David Arnold, who had apparently been working in a video store before he was hired for the movie. All of these elements seemed to spark the imagination of its audiences, and the Stargate itself was the plot device responsible for literally opening up a whole world of franchise opportunity. Quite a number of real Ancient Egyptian historians believe in the existence of a Stargate, some having published extended texts aiming to prove their theories. Others think the pyramids were built by aliens, and all of these theories form the basis of the film, with the character of Daniel Jackson being the voice for these historians and their far flung ideas. It's a movie that answers so many 'what if' questions, and due to a very enthusiastic level of research on the part of the writers, it pulls it off in a convincing fashion.

Patrick Tatopolous' Anubis guard design
But in my mind, there's a far more obvious reason for the success of the movie. The narrative features a team of United States Airmen travelling to a desolate desert world to save its primitive inhabitants from the clutches of an oppressive overlord. Now is that tapping into the mentality of American audiences still sore from a Middle Eastern conflict or what?

The movie's Horus guard design
If I'm completely honest, I prefer the movie to any of the subsequent television adaptations. The film feels much more grand and cinematic, as you would expect. But in addition to that, the concepts are presented much more believably, and the integration of ancient Egyptian cultural reference gives it much more focus than the amalgamation of ideas presented on the show. The realisation of the Horus and Anubis guard costumes by Greek designer Patrick Tatopolous ranks as one of the most memorable and ridiculously cool costume designs in movie history, and Spader and Russell still feel like the definitive versions of their respective characters even after all these years. It's the character progression within the movie that sells them, depicting a Colonel O'Neil tackling the loss of his son by going on an apparent 'suicide mission', while Dr. Jackson is ever the face of optimism despite seemingly insurmountable odds.

Ra's original alien form before the
TV show abandoned the concept

Disappointingly, when adapting Stargate to the TV format, there were a number of changes made that create noticeable inconsistencies between the film and SG-1. In the movie, there were no such characters as the Goa'uld, who are represented in the show as host stealing parasitic worms. In the 1994 feature, Ra is depicted as a bipedal 'Roswell' type alien and described as the last of a dying race who takes human form through possessing a selected host. Other discrepancies between the film and series include various unexplainable character name changes, and a new arrangement of stargate symbols that almost completely re-engineers the gate dialling concept from the film. As you might expect, these inconsistencies have been integrated into the series canon via explanations by fans and extended fiction, but they're still there as a reminder of the original concepts set in motion by the 1994 film.
The Goa'uld parasite as depicted in SG-1
But despite these minor problems, I'm still a fan of SG-1. The first seasons in particular were excellent, with their plot lines expanding upon the themes touched on in the movie. Although the differences between Kurt Russell and Richard Dean Anderson's take on Colonel O'Neil(l) are enormous, both versions of the character are entertaining to watch. But as the series went on, things became overcomplicated, and a noticeable shift from the thematic material of the movie distanced a lot of viewers, including myself. But it could hardly have run for 10 seasons without introducing new concepts along the way, so this was inevitable.


Interestingly, Dean Devlin has explained that he always intended for Stargate to be a trilogy of films, but the rights were snatched up by MGM and rolled into a TV show before they had chance to put a second movie into production. He's now stated as recently as July 2011 that he intends to see the sequels made in an alternate continuity to the TV series, and apparently MGM is interested. Now that Stargate has run its course on TV, perhaps a new movie from the original creators is not such a far fetched idea?

How would you feel about another Stargate movie? Is it too late to resurrect the original cast? Should it be a sequel to the TV shows? Or should it be left well alone?

8 comments:

  1. I would like to see a sequal as well as a return of SG1. No more SGU it was very poor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just watched it for the first time, and I ended up here looking for a sequel! The movie was awesome, SG-1 was good as well, but a movie done by the original writer would be the best.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only way to make sequels to the original film set in the same continuity is to make them so that they are able to stand alone; that means no Daniel, no O'Neil, no mention of events from the first film, etc. A good way to do that is to have another brand new set of characters discover another Stargate on Earth, and allow them to experience brand new planets and fight brand new menaces of their own.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Make sequels to the original film, have them set in the same continuity, but make them so that they are able to stand alone. Forget Daniel and O'Neil, Creek Mountain and Abydos; introduce new characters to fill the Daniel/O'Neil roles, introduce a second Earth-based Stargate, introduce another Stargate program, introduce brand new worlds, and introduce new enemies - whether they be directly connected to Ra or not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But isn't that what Stargate Atlantis and SGU did? My concern is that all possibilities to expand the Stargate universe have been exhausted already by the TV shows. If I'm correct, Brad Wright and Jonathan Glassner wanted to exhaust all possible avenues for the franchise (a sequel series, two spin off series, made for TV movies and a cartoon show) before the rights reverted back to the original creators. What I've read in the past suggests they don't exactly see eye to eye with Devlin. They were never willing to 'share creative ownership.'
      So if Devlin/Emmerich really do want to continue their Stargate story, an alternate continuity may be their best and only option.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    1st: Teal'c is a Jaffa not a Goa'uld
    and
    2nd: They're Airman not Marines(for the most part).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah yeah you're right, my bad. Changes made : )

      Delete
  6. i say the original movie says that ra was the only servivor of his kind who took hosts which meant he mite have been a parasitic race and he died they ant have a sequal unless they adapt sg1 idea that ra wasnt the only one that where show started

    ReplyDelete